Every Exam Format, One Platform

1. Five Assessment Types, One Wizard

Creating an assessment is a four-step guided flow: basic details, questions and sections, participants, and access control. Each step tracks its own completion, and nothing is visible to learners until it is published — which matters more than it sounds when several staff are building papers at once.

Around the type sit the decisions that define exam day: the live date window candidates may start within, an optional timed preview so they can read the paper before the clock starts, whether submission is automatic at expiry or manual, whether results release automatically or on your word, how many re-attempts are permitted, and whether candidates may request extra time mid-exam for an admin to approve.

2. Nine Question Types, Including Ones That Run Code

A question bank is only as useful as the formats it can hold. Papers here mix objective and subjective questions freely, and each question is individually marked for automatic or manual evaluation — so a mixed paper grades its objective half instantly while the essays wait for a marker.

3. Sections and Marking Rules That Match Real Exam Patterns

Competitive exam patterns are rarely uniform. Any assessment splits into sections, each with its own description, duration and marking rules — per question marks, negative marking, partial credit, cutoff marks and question shuffling, with the total recalculating live as the paper is built. Time limits apply at whichever level the pattern demands: whole assessment, per section, or per question. Whether candidates may move back and forth between sections is your decision, not a platform constraint.

4. Getting Questions In Without Retyping Them

Most institutes already own their question bank — it is just trapped in Word files and PDFs. A .docx paper can be imported directly: configurable markers tell the importer what a question, an option and an answer look like in your format, question types are detected from the answers given, comprehension passages come across attached to their sub-questions, and embedded images and equations are converted and hosted so they render on any device. Anything that does not parse is flagged with a reason before saving, rather than silently corrupting the paper.

5. Who Sits the Exam: Closed Batches or an Open Link

Closed tests are assigned to selected batches or hand-picked learners, with bulk batch registration for whole cohorts. Open tests are the interesting case: they generate a shareable public link and a downloadable QR code, backed by a registration form you build field by field and reorder by dragging, with its own registration window separate from the exam window.

That combination is what makes a scholarship test or an open mock practical as an admissions channel. Every registrant appears in an exportable list tagged with how they arrived — admin pre-registration, batch assignment, or the public link — so the marketing question of which channel produced which candidates has an answer.

6. The Exam That Happens on Paper

Plenty of serious exams still happen in a hall with an answer booklet, and that is not a failure of digitisation. OMR mode covers pen-and-paper tests whose responses are entered afterwards — question by question with the original rich question content rendered on screen for careful entry, or through a spreadsheet-style grid when there are hundreds of sheets to process.

Once entered, those attempts are indistinguishable from online ones as far as the rest of the system is concerned: the same grading, the same leaderboards, the same report cards, the same analytics. The institute gets the digital stack without forcing the exam online.

7. Grading: Automatic, Manual, or AI-Assisted

Objective questions score on submission. Subjective ones go to a dedicated evaluation area with live, upcoming and past tabs and a participant sidebar showing who still needs marking. Evaluators annotate scanned answer sheets in the browser, award marks per question against the answer key, use a built-in calculator for totals, and save partial work as a draft to resume later.

Where AI evaluation is used, it reads scanned PDFs including handwriting and mathematical notation, applies your marking rubric, and returns question-wise marks with written feedback — which teachers review and override before anything is released. If an answer key changes after the exam, re-evaluation runs at any granularity: the whole assessment, selected participants, or specific questions for specific candidates, with an audit log recording every change.

8. Results That Explain Themselves

A mark alone starts arguments. The learner report includes the score breakdown, comparison against batch averages and toppers, leaderboard position where the institute enables it, and the distribution showing what percentage of peers picked each option on every question — which turns a post-exam discussion into a teaching session. Reports download as formatted PDFs or as AI-narrated report cards with written feedback on the attempt.

9. Where Assessments Sit in the Wider Course

Assessments are not only standalone events. Quizzes and question slides sit inside courses as part of a lesson, in-video questions interrupt a recording at a chosen moment, and assignments and homework carry their own submission and review flow. The same question bank feeds all of them, which is what keeps a practice quiz in week three and the term exam in week twelve measuring the same syllabus.